Hot Tub Forum
Original => Hot Tub Forum => Topic started by: Trenden on February 24, 2007, 02:10:30 am
-
My wife and I have visited four dealerships so far wet testing and we’ve found at least one tub at each that we like in our price range. So… I’m hoping to find some feedback on what the forum thinks regarding brand quality. The tubs we’re considering are: Arctic Cub Signature ($7,500), Coleman 471 ($7,800), Sundance Hamilton ($7,500), and HotSpring Envoy ($8,800). Since the HotSpring is about a thousand more than the others I’m leaning away from it.
Anyway, these all seam like great tubs and feel great to my wife and I and each brand seems to have advantages and disadvantages. All the salesman we talked to were very professional and none really bad mouthed any others. In fact, the Coleman also mentioned that Sundance and Hotsprings were good brands and that we should check them out too before making a purchase.
Here are my impressions so far and I’d love to hear your feedback:
Arctic: Attractive real wood exterior, solid construction and dealer tells a great story, forever floor seems good, heat lock system makes sense to me as an engineer, dealer willing to negotiate pricing, can add more jets later, ozone option $700 extra
Coleman: Very comfortable design; not as many jets; includes ozone; seems very well built with steel frame and solid base; I like that the dealer has some models open so you can see inside; everything accessible by removing panels may make maintenance easy; exterior look is frankly not as nice as the others
Sundance: Very beautiful tub; wife thinks the lighting on the 2007 model is cool; seem to have a great filtration system; price doesn’t include ozone but the option is not very expensive; seems well built; plastic waterfall looks cheap… like my kids would probably break it within a week; beautiful fake wood exterior is probably the best looking I’ve seen; salesman was good but got weird vibes from store manager which worries me a bit
HotSpring: Everything about the external appearance looks first class but as an engineer it bugs me that their brochure and website doesn’t say much at all about the interior construction and neither would the dealer -- I’m sure the inside is high-quality too but I want to see! moto-massage is unique; ozone and filtration system seem fantastic, overall it just looks like a great high-quality tub
I’m currently leaning towards the Sundance or Coleman but I’m just not sure. Any advice???
-
WET TEST! Take the family out and get wet! You've narrowed it down to quality units, so let your comfort/enjoyment of each decide for you. I cannot comment at all on the prices- perhaps someone else can.
-
Yes, we’ve been wet testing. I’ve been dragging my poor 7-months pregnant wife all over this city wet testing. The four tubs I listed all feel good to us. That’s why I’m down to pricing, perceptions of quality and “gut feel” about the dealers…
-
Arctic and Coleman are built under the same principle of thermopane insulation.
Personally, I have been impressed with the Arctic tubs heat retention. Not a dig on Coleman but Arctic is represented here a little more. I think you can forget the "add jets later" as I think most people buy the tub "as is" and live with it however they buy it. When I saw a Coleman tub, I liked it (except for the limited color choice)but didn't like the dealer so I didn't go further.
Sundance has a lot of happy owners as does Hot Springs. Don't let the $1,000 steer you away from a tub ... remember you'll have this tub 10+ years so that's $100 a year or less.
Don't get caught up in the insulation method as both if made correctly will be energy efficient. And based on your selection all 4 are made correctly.
Since the wet tests have proved positive then the other criteria is the dealer - buy from the one which you feel the most comfortable from. There are horror stories out there about dealers but judging from the dealers represented here and my own dealer - there are some great dealers out there!!!
-
Trenden,
All 4 tubs you mention are quality hot tubs. Since you feel that they are roughly equal in quality I would look at the dealer as a possible deciding factor. Look for a dealer that has been in business for a number of years, check with the BBB for their track history or talk to some of their past customers. Your going to own this Hot Tub for 10 plus years, make sure the dealers going to be there with you
Good luck
-
Keep looking, keep notes and take them with you. Make sure the dealers know you are looking around and a serious buyer. If you could live with any of those choices, perhaps one will shake loose with a deal to stand out.
-
HotSpring: Everything about the external appearance looks first class but as an engineer it bugs me that their brochure and website doesn’t say much at all about the interior construction and neither would the dealer -- I’m sure the inside is high-quality too but I want to see! moto-massage is unique; ozone and filtration system seem fantastic, overall it just looks like a great high-quality tub
I'm not sure what you're looking for regarding the interior, but here's a recent post by Chas that might give you some more information:
Just a quick note about foam - HS uses many different types of foam built up in layers. They install a very dense foam on the back of the shell in a layer about an inch thick. This helps to support the shell, keeps the seats and floor areas from flexing when you walk on them etc. This layer is installed by a computer-controlled robotic spray arm in an environmentally-controlled tunnel. It is done before the shells are plumbed. After plumbing is installed and pressure checked twice, then a less dense foam is added around the plumbing to support it. That foam is about 10 pounds per square foot, and adds strength to the plumbing but also acts as a bond beam around the perimeter of the tub itself.
Only then are the cavities filled with softer foam - which holds more air and insulates best.
Finally the bottom of the tub is sealed with a 60 pound density shell which is just about bullet-proof. It is a custom-made plastic bottom which encapsulates all but the very bottom of the pressure-treated timbers which the spa sits on.
8-)
-
My wife and I have visited four dealerships so far wet testing and we’ve found at least one tub at each that we like in our price range. So… I’m hoping to find some feedback on what the forum thinks regarding brand quality. The tubs we’re considering are: Arctic Cub Signature ($7,500), Coleman 471 ($7,800), Sundance Hamilton ($7,500), and HotSpring Envoy ($8,800). Since the HotSpring is about a thousand more than the others I’m leaning away from it.
Anyway, these all seam like great tubs and feel great to my wife and I and each brand seems to have advantages and disadvantages. All the salesman we talked to were very professional and none really bad mouthed any others. In fact, the Coleman also mentioned that Sundance and Hotsprings were good brands and that we should check them out too before making a purchase.
Here are my impressions so far and I’d love to hear your feedback:
Arctic: Attractive real wood exterior, solid construction and dealer tells a great story, forever floor seems good, heat lock system makes sense to me as an engineer, dealer willing to negotiate pricing, can add more jets later, ozone option $700 extra
Coleman: Very comfortable design; not as many jets; includes ozone; seems very well built with steel frame and solid base; I like that the dealer has some models open so you can see inside; everything accessible by removing panels may make maintenance easy; exterior look is frankly not as nice as the others
Sundance: Very beautiful tub; wife thinks the lighting on the 2007 model is cool; seem to have a great filtration system; price doesn’t include ozone but the option is not very expensive; seems well built; plastic waterfall looks cheap… like my kids would probably break it within a week; beautiful fake wood exterior is probably the best looking I’ve seen; salesman was good but got weird vibes from store manager which worries me a bit
HotSpring: Everything about the external appearance looks first class but as an engineer it bugs me that their brochure and website doesn’t say much at all about the interior construction and neither would the dealer -- I’m sure the inside is high-quality too but I want to see! moto-massage is unique; ozone and filtration system seem fantastic, overall it just looks like a great high-quality tub
I’m currently leaning towards the Sundance or Coleman but I’m just not sure. Any advice???
You would do fine with any one of these spas. $700 for ozone seems expensive..I would skip it at that price. The value of ozone is debatable. You can add the ozonator to the Sundance anytime, so if the dealer won't add it in or drop the price, you can try it without and add later if you feel it is necessary. As the owner of a wood exterior tub, I will warn you it takes a little maintenance, but for some of us, it is worth it. All the spas you are looking at are quality.
-
Do you have a Maruqis or D1 dealer in your area? Another option might be caldera....
-
I personally don't think you can go wrong with a Arctic Spa. The Arctic Cub is what I have and it was the most comfortable of any that I had tested. I tested a Hot Spring, Cal Spa, Sundance, Master Spa, and a Emerald Spa, and the Arctic was by far the best. My wife really liked the Arctic over the others becuase the Arctic Spa was the only one that we found that had massaging jets for the legs in the lounger where all others had just air jets, and she doesn't like those. We really liked the feel of the jets, the warranty is very good, and we thougt that the forever floor was the best idea that we had seen, and the other spas we looked at didnt have that feature as well. I definetly would go with the Arctic.
-
I tested a Hot Spring, Cal Spa, Sundance, Master Spa, and a Emerald Spa, and the Arctic was by far the best.
Why don't we qualify this with the addition of one of the following phrases:
1. For Me.
2. IMO.
-
Why don't we qualify this with the addition of one of the following phrases:
1. For Me.
2. IMO.
I agree "for me" this should be in the forum rules "IMO" anyway.
Ray
-
If someone says they wet tested and "xxxx" was the best, it seems pretty obvious to me that they mean IMO and "for me," without having to be so explicit......the whole point of a wet test is to establish personal opinion. It feels like PC rules are encroaching here......
-
Why don't we qualify this with the addition of one of the following phrases:
1. For Me.
2. IMO.
+2
-
Be honest with yourself. Will you maintain the wood exterior if you get one? I asked myself that question and the look my wife gave me made me pass on wood.
-
My wife and I have visited four dealerships so far wet testing and we’ve found at least one tub at each that we like in our price range. So… I’m hoping to find some feedback on what the forum thinks regarding brand quality. The tubs we’re considering are: Arctic Cub Signature ($7,500), Coleman 471 ($7,800), Sundance Hamilton ($7,500), and HotSpring Envoy ($8,800). Since the HotSpring is about a thousand more than the others I’m leaning away from it.
Anyway, these all seam like great tubs and feel great to my wife and I and each brand seems to have advantages and disadvantages. All the salesman we talked to were very professional and none really bad mouthed any others. In fact, the Coleman also mentioned that Sundance and Hotsprings were good brands and that we should check them out too before making a purchase.
Here are my impressions so far and I’d love to hear your feedback:
Arctic: Attractive real wood exterior, solid construction and dealer tells a great story, forever floor seems good, heat lock system makes sense to me as an engineer, dealer willing to negotiate pricing, can add more jets later, ozone option $700 extra
Coleman: Very comfortable design; not as many jets; includes ozone; seems very well built with steel frame and solid base; I like that the dealer has some models open so you can see inside; everything accessible by removing panels may make maintenance easy; exterior look is frankly not as nice as the others
Sundance: Very beautiful tub; wife thinks the lighting on the 2007 model is cool; seem to have a great filtration system; price doesn’t include ozone but the option is not very expensive; seems well built; plastic waterfall looks cheap… like my kids would probably break it within a week; beautiful fake wood exterior is probably the best looking I’ve seen; salesman was good but got weird vibes from store manager which worries me a bit
HotSpring: Everything about the external appearance looks first class but as an engineer it bugs me that their brochure and website doesn’t say much at all about the interior construction and neither would the dealer -- I’m sure the inside is high-quality too but I want to see! moto-massage is unique; ozone and filtration system seem fantastic, overall it just looks like a great high-quality tub
I’m currently leaning towards the Sundance or Coleman but I’m just not sure. Any advice???
I'm with Stu, I would check out Dimension One, Beachcomber, Marquis before I decided on any of the above mentioned brands. It sounds like you are approaching it the right way and not paying much attention to the marketing hype.
I'm not a big Coleman fan as I feel there insulation desing is not as effective as Arctic and the steel frame is a bit hoaky (rust and loose rattling rivets) And I also think there seating is a bit confining, but this is all just my opinion.
-
I'm not a big Coleman fan as I feel there insulation desing is not as effective as Arctic and the steel frame is a bit hoaky (rust and loose rattling rivets) And I also think there seating is a bit confining, but this is all just my opinion.
Could you please clarify if you’ve personally seen “rusty Coleman frames with loose rattling rivets”?
I ask because my experience with zinc coating of steel (not in the hot tub industry) is that is does a decent good at preventing rust. Also, I’m not sure why their rivets would work loose and rattle.
The steel frame is one of the things I liked about the Coleman design over wood which expands and contracts and eventually rots… so if you’ve personally seen the things you mentioned vs. just imagining they might be issues I’d appreciate the info. That just might influence our decision.
-
Tony had very good advice. As did most posting. As for the metal in the tub verses wood, I think its a non-issue. The wood is treated and the metal is coated. You won't own it long enough for it to be a factor. 10 years, you will be in something else and someone that can't afford a new tub will be in the one you are buying. Kinda like a used car.
-
"Why don't we qualify this with the addition of one of the following phrases:
1. For Me.
2. IMO. "
IMO..........................Come on guys we are nitpicking here. Trenden asked for opinions on a Arctic spa, and I gave my opinion. I don't need to preface it with For me and IMO when I am the one saying what I did. Just because I am a newbie on this board and I dont have 5 stars under my name doesnt mean I need internet junkies nitpicking my respone. I post when I feel my advice is needed. I don't just post to post like a lot of other fools on this board do just to add to their post count. Get lives people.
IMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
-
Please let me know if you have any questions on the Arctic Spa. I have been a dealer of Arctic for 8 years now.
The wood exterior is easy to maintain. A customer of mine just sold there house, the new owner didn't want the Arctic Spa. The spa was never stained in the 4 years. I have pictures of a 4 year old spa before and after. It looks close to brand new! I can e-mail you a picture if you like.
Also Arctic spas can now come with a No-Maintenance cabinet as an option.
Michael
-
If someone says they wet tested and "xxxx" was the best, it seems pretty obvious to me that they mean IMO and "for me," without having to be so explicit...
What anne said. Unless we want to quote the definition of a forum on every page: "An Internet forum is a facility on the World Wide Web for holding discussions and posting user generated content"
Sheesh.
Anyway - In_Canada stated it well, all 4 are reputable manufacturers, so take the dealer into account, any deals they may have as wmccall says, and make your choice based on personal preference. Good luck!
-
What's the difference with the Artic O3 system and other on the market? Why is Artic's 2x as much? Anyone know?
-
What's the difference with the Artic O3 system and other on the market? Why is Artic's 2x as much? Anyone know?
No, but I sure would like to. That is one thing about my tub that I am unhappy with, and I think I was ripped off. I cannot blame anyone, as I *chose* to pay for it, but the value has to be extremely questionable. I did not research well enough what an ozonator SHOULD cost before delving in.
-
No, but I sure would like to. That is one thing about my tub that I am unhappy with, and I think I was ripped off. I cannot blame anyone, as I *chose* to pay for it, but the value has to be extremely questionable. I did not research well enough what an ozonator SHOULD cost before delving in.
Anne,
You used the term ripped off. I hope you realize the differance between ozone units. One brand that shal remain nameless offers an ozone unit that produces 3.2 mg per hour and sell it for about $150-$200. They also offer a unit that produces 250mg per hour (almost 100 times stronger) and sell that unit for around $400 - $500. Both look the same and to the average consumer. Some may feel that paying $500 is being "ripped off" But to tell you the truth, selling you a "Cheap" ozone is the real "rip off"
-
Could you please clarify if you’ve personally seen “rusty Coleman frames with loose rattling rivets”?
I ask because my experience with zinc coating of steel (not in the hot tub industry) is that is does a decent good at preventing rust. Also, I’m not sure why their rivets would work loose and rattle.
The steel frame is one of the things I liked about the Coleman design over wood which expands and contracts and eventually rots… so if you’ve personally seen the things you mentioned vs. just imagining they might be issues I’d appreciate the info. That just might influence our decision.
Yeah Tman, we're all waiting with baited breath for your first hand experience with rusty Coleman frames and loose rivets.
Please don't cut and run on us.
(thinking about selling my Coleman now, since my frame is obviously rusty and has loose rivets. Damm, what was I thinking when I opted for a metal frame instead of wood?)
Trendan, to be serious, Coleman and the other brands you listed are all top'o'theline brands. I used to have a fullfoam spa that developed a leak and lead to a rotten wood frame, which is the reason my new spa is a Coleman, plus the Coleman was by far the quietest spa of them all.
This board used to be rampant with full foam lovers who would take digs at the likes of any thermal pane designed tub, but I see lately that is not the norm anymore. But some people still like to get their "digs" in.
I believe in today's marketplace, that either insulation method works fine when you mention a top name brand.
Like others have said, comfort of the seating should be your number one criteria, but then again, if you're like me, that wasn't much of an issue, I'm easy about that, I do tend to favor the more open type of seating arrangements though.
Good luck in getting the right tub for you.
-
...Just because I am a newbie on this board and I dont have 5 stars under my name doesnt mean I need internet junkies nitpicking my respone. I post when I feel my advice is needed. I don't just post to post like a lot of other fools on this board do just to add to their post count. Get lives people.
Wow! :o If you state an opinion, you have to be ready for others to challenge, or qualify it -- especially when you state something as fact, and others don't think it is that clear cut. Don't take it personally, or make it personal by responding to gentle criticism/clarification with name-calling.
-
"Why don't we qualify this with the addition of one of the following phrases:
1. For Me.
2. IMO. "
IMO..........................Come on guys we are nitpicking here. Trenden asked for opinions on a Arctic spa, and I gave my opinion. I don't need to preface it with For me and IMO when I am the one saying what I did. Just because I am a newbie on this board and I dont have 5 stars under my name doesnt mean I need internet junkies nitpicking my respone. I post when I feel my advice is needed. I don't just post to post like a lot of other fools on this board do just to add to their post count. Get lives people.
IMO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Hmmm, seems we were dissed. Somebody get their white glove out and give Huggiebear a cyber slap.... :-?
Though I disagree with the concept of you having to clarify the obvious of it being your opinion, I disagree less with your childlike response in anger. SO THERE! :P :) (I'm getting off the computer now and getting a life) For a lil while anyway... ;)
Steve
-
Dont let the children get to you, Huggieville. I think they missed their naps.
Welcome to the forum.
-
Dont let the children get to you, Huggieville. I think they missed their naps.
This from the lady who lectured the rest of us on hostility! :o ;) BTW, given the number of stars under your name, Huggie may think you need to "get a life"! ;D
-
I definitely don't think that of Anne. She is one of the few unbiased posters on this board that has lots of good advice. Sure she likes her Arctic Spa as do most Arctic owners, but you don't see her on here everyday giving a sales pitch or telling everyone why they should buy one. She posts on here to give good advice and when people ask for advice on Arctic Spas, she tells why she has liked her Arctic spa, and that is all I was trying to do for Trenden when he had asked about that brand. Unfortunately there are some biased nit-pickers on this board, and it gets frustrating for some, that’s all. IMO
-
This from the lady who lectured the rest of us on hostility! :o ;)
That's the first thing I thought of too! Of all people Anne... 8-) ;D
-
... Unfortunately there are some biased nit-pickers on this board, and it gets frustrating for some, that’s all. IMO
The problem is you went off on a response from a non-biased, non-nitpicker who just happened to think your post came across a bit strong. To me, his words were less offensive than "internet junkies, fools, and get lives" -- but I guess that would be "nitpicking"! ;)
-
Get lives people.
but...but....this IS my life!!!!
-
but...but....this IS my life!!!!
Boy can I relate.
8-)
-
Reese- You are entitled to your opinion, as am I, and as are the people that you think are non biased. Now all you people responding to my 2 posts have turned me into a internet junkie. I guess I now need to get a life too. ;)
-
Reese- You are entitled to your opinion, as am I, and as are the people that you think are non biased. Now all you people responding to my 2 posts have turned me into a internet junkie. I guess I now need to get a life too. ;)
:) Welcome to the club! Now if we can just get that mean Anne to join in "Kumbaya"... ;) ;D
-
Dude go with the HS... HS="BALLER".
-
Dude go with the HS... HS="BALLER".
I guess I'm getting old. Does this mean you will get action in the HS?
-
O ya baby and much much more 8-)
Hollywood Baller!!
-
? :-? Could I interest you in a video server? I'll even tell you how to set it up!
-
Sorry guys. Having an extremely $hiity day, and I just should not have posted at all. My perception must be skewed by things, as I did not mean to be hostile, just didn't want Huggie to feel alientated.
And I should not have use the term "ripped off." My internal filters are not working at all today.
::) :P :-[
-
? :-? Could I interest you in a video server? I'll even tell you how to set it up!
Sure teach me...
-
Well, then smile.
It absolutely will NOT make you feel any better,
but it makes people around you wonder if you've completely lost it,
and they'll leave you alone.
Hope tomorrow is better.
8-)