Hot Tub Forum
Original => Hot Tub Forum => Topic started by: anne on April 17, 2006, 09:24:43 pm
-
1) Any opinions out there about Leisure Time Bright and Clear vs Sea Klear CLarifier?
2) Is there a difference between Leisure Time Renew and Oz? The only difference I could find is that Renew advertises to be buffered/stabilized, and OZ says nothing about that, just says "ideal for ozone"- why? They seem to be about the same price, just granular versus tablet.
3) Is buffered/stabilized MPS worth the extra cost? I'm comparing Leisure Time Renew (32%MPS at $19.95 for 2lbs) to Sea Klear Shock (45%MPS at $15.95 for 2.2 lbs)
thanks!
-
1. IMO both work well, but I don't use clarifiers much...only when I absolutely need to.
2. LT Renew and Oz are the same...except Oz come in tablet form.
3. IMO non buffered MPS is the better product..you use much less.
-
3. IMO non buffered MPS is the better product..you use much less.
So the 32% and 45% dont mean that you'd need more of the 32%?
-
My submersible pump that I use to drain my spa leaked oil, and when I refilled it I had a horrible mess. I put a super dose of Sea Klear in and the next morning it was perfect. I'm a big fan.
-
My submersible pump that I use to drain my spa leaked oil, and when I refilled it I had a horrible mess. I put a super dose of Sea Klear in and the next morning it was perfect. I'm a big fan.
You're not supposed to use the same pump for spa draining and oil siphoning! ;) ;D
-
So the 32% and 45% dont mean that you'd need more of the 32%?
Renew is buffered meaning there is an agent added to bring the pH to neutral. You will need more of this product than a non buffered MPS. Using a non buffered MPS will draw your pH down, so you would have to adjust on your own. IMO you use a lot less product with non buffered MPS. On top of that buffered MPS is expensive. I use a very inexpensive non buffered MPS and of course baking soda to raise pH when needed is cheap.
-
thanks, Tony. I misread you the first time and thought you said "buffered MPS is the better product..." thus my question about the relative precentages.