Hot Tub Forum
Original => Hot Tub Forum => Topic started by: Helios on December 14, 2007, 11:30:24 am
-
It's time to see how Coast Spas handles their warrenties. The shell on my Coast Helios is warped.
I saw steam coming out from under the corners of the tub and icicles hanging from the corners of the cover. After Northwoodsdipper's thread, I decided to check my hot tub and here's what I found.
(http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc279/greg_bbs/Hottub003.jpg)
(http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc279/greg_bbs/Hottub002.jpg)
(http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc279/greg_bbs/Hottub001.jpg)
(http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc279/greg_bbs/Hottub008.jpg)
(http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc279/greg_bbs/Hottub005.jpg)
(http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc279/greg_bbs/Hottub007.jpg)
The district manager for my dealer looked at it today and tried to tell me that if I straped the corners of the cover down, it would be ok. I told him that my brother is a mould maker by profession and that I was a mechanic with aot of knowledge/experience with engineering. At this point, he seemed to realized the standard fluff won't work on me.
The district manager finally said that he would forward my complaint letter and pictures to the head of Coast's warrenty department in BC.
If they don't take care of me, I may have to get Term's friend out. (http://i218.photobucket.com/albums/cc279/greg_bbs/die.gif)
-
I am curious - do you think the shell has changed shape since the day it was delivered, or was it just made this way?
The reason I ask is simply that if the tub is made this way, the replacement may very well be the same.
I suppose you could go to the dealer with a straightedge in hand and look at a similar model.
Hope it comes out ok.
8-)
-
I can see the issue you are concerned with and I understand why you're getting icecles.
What I also see is that your spa is recessed into the deck. Any decision regarding the spa could require replacement, but it will obviously be hindered by removal. Have you made any provisions for the removal of the spa from it's setting (open on one side to slide out).
First, let's see what Coast comes up with, replace or not. Assuming they would replace it, how would you remove the spa and install the new one, and who would be responsible for those expenses, you or Coast? (You, I think) IF a manufacturer replaces a spa, it does not mean that they will pay freight, delivery or removal of the spa.
Just a heads up, but, I would list and consider all remedy options available and their related expenses to you. A simple fix (such as a space filler, or strapping the cover down, bending the cover foam) may be an inexpensive solution where replacement may come at you with some $ signs.
-
I am curious - do you think the shell has changed shape since the day it was delivered, or was it just made this way?
The reason I ask is simply that if the tub is made this way, the replacement may very well be the same.
I suppose you could go to the dealer with a straightedge in hand and look at a similar model.
Hope it comes out ok.
I think it was like that from day 1. Each corner varies from 5/16" ~ 5/8". I only noticed because of the steam leaking out and Northwoodsdipper's thread.
When looking at the underside of the cover, you can see that their are no marks on the corners of the cover where it would touch/seal to the corners of the tub.
A friend has the same Coast tub without the lounger and his is dead level.
I checked my concrete pad and it's level on all 4 sides and there are no cracks around the parimeter of the pad. (There goes the first excuse that the dealer gave me via phone).
8-)
[/color]
-
I can see the issue you are concerned with and I understand why you're getting icecles.
What I also see is that your spa is recessed into the deck. Any decision regarding the spa could require replacement, but it will obviously be hindered by removal. Have you made any provisions for the removal of the spa from it's setting (open on one side to slide out).
First, let's see what Coast comes up with, replace or not. Assuming they would replace it, how would you remove the spa and install the new one, and who would be responsible for those expenses, you or Coast? (You, I think) IF a manufacturer replaces a spa, it does not mean that they will pay freight, delivery or removal of the spa.
Just a heads up, but, I would list and consider all remedy options available and their related expenses to you. A simple fix (such as a space filler, or strapping the cover down, bending the cover foam) may be an inexpensive solution where replacement may come at you with some $ signs.
My arguement is that it was defective from day 1 (my proof is that the the underside of the cover does not have marks in the corners where it should be touching/sealing to the corners of the tub). Ultimately, they have not fulfilled their end of the contract by delivering a non-defective tub. Under Ontario Consumer laws, they would have to replace the tub free of charge (including delivery/installation but not my time to take the front off the deck) or refund the purchase price.
Almost all stated warrenties have a clause something like "your state or province may give you additional rights not stated in this warrenty". Most provinces and I believe states have consumer laws that give you added protection that the manufactures don't want you to know about so of course they don't state them in their warrenties. It's their way of trying to deter claims and save money.
I expect an uphill battle but the bottom line is they delivered a defective tub and did not fulfill the sales contract. There is only 1 Coast dealer in my town; a little pressure of threats and bad publicity can go a long way to help them decide to do the right thing.
-
Should be interesting to see how this all plays out.
You say your friend has the same spa, without the lounger? Then it's a DIFFERENT spa, made in a different mold. I don't believe I've ever seen a spa "warp" in the way it's being suspected yours is, and am more prone to thinking the mold the shell was made in isn't flat. I could imagine that if this is the case, the manufacturer may claim that your spa is not having a warranty problem, that's the way it was made.
I had a manufacturer legally deny a warranty claim made by me many years ago, saying that in fact the problem was not a manufacturing defect (which would have been covered under warranty) but was actually a "design defect", which was NOT covered by warranty............ they went out of business shortly there after ;D
Just to play devils advocate, and maybe give you something to think about for compiling some ammo........ If their mold isn't flat and ALL of this model of spa are coming out this way...... If you looked at one before buying, and it too had this same drop on the corner , well, you bought exactly what was shown to you..... I doubt it says anywhere that you'd be getting a spa with a perfectly flat top-edge and the cover would seal perfectly to it.
-
Should be interesting to see how this all plays out.
You say your friend has the same spa, without the lounger? Then it's a DIFFERENT spa, made in a different mold. I don't believe I've ever seen a spa "warp" in the way it's being suspected yours is, and am more prone to thinking the mold the shell was made in isn't flat. I could imagine that if this is the case, the manufacturer may claim that your spa is not having a warranty problem, that's the way it was made.
I had a manufacturer legally deny a warranty claim made by me many years ago, saying that in fact the problem was not a manufacturing defect (which would have been covered under warranty) but was actually a "design defect", which was NOT covered by warranty............ they went out of business shortly there after ;D
Just to play devils advocate, and maybe give you something to think about for compiling some ammo........ If their mold isn't flat and ALL of this model of spa are coming out this way...... If you looked at one before buying, and it too had this same drop on the corner , well, you bought exactly what was shown to you..... I doubt it says anywhere that you'd be getting a spa with a perfectly flat top-edge and the cover would seal perfectly to it.
Very valid points to consider. My arguement is:
1. because the cover is flat, the tub should be flat.
2. the salesmen told me it's the same tub with and without lounger; the only difference is the lounger. (I understand they would have to use different moulds)
3. Like a car, if the window or convertable top does not seal, it is fixed under warrenty. (I know comparing hot tubs and cars is like apples and oranges but they are both manufactured consumer products)
4. the floor model "Helios" I looked at has been sold and I am positive it was flat ;D (I doubt they would go to that customer and say we need to use your spa to prove that we have a design flaw in this model)
Dr. Spa, I appreciate you suggesting what their arguements might be; the above would likely be my responce to them if and when they make such a claim.
-
I would think either way... if it is the mold...and it turns out to be a design defect... I would be singing ...class action suit!!!! you know anyone with a Helios...would be jumping on board when the realize that theirs is not level either. ::)
-
Is foundation underneath the tub flat? My contracts state that you will provide a continuously level surface. If there is a dip in the concrete the frame of the spa would settle low and the shell would probably follow that dip. You might want to take a look at the foundation.
-
It's not the mold. The spa is sagging in the corners from lack of structural support in that area.
-
It's not the mold. The spa is sagging in the corners from lack of structural support in that area.
Hmmm, that's quite an internet diagnosis......
It is amazing what can be done over a high speed connection nowadays!
-
I THINK YOUR SCREWED. YOU CAN'T FIX THAT. ITS NEW TUB TIME. WHAT ARE THE CHACES THAT YOU WOULD GET A NEW TUB? GOOD LUCK!
-
The question I will pose is have you ever used the wind straps on that side of the tub??
If you haven't in some instances you will not get an absolute air tight seal. The coast rim is curved and your cover is straight. Right from the get go it is not a perfect fit. The straps will mold the cover to the top of the rim. Now that its cold out, the cover becomes more rigid and will not form properly thus creating that little gap. Now it may very well be a defect but 9/10 its the non use of straps to mold the cover that is the issue.
Now a spa wont sag if the corner is unstable it will crack and come apart if its that extreme.
-
I don't believe I've ever seen a spa "warp" in the way it's being suspected yours is, and am more prone to thinking the mold the shell was made in isn't flat.
Doc,
I don't think its the mold, CNC mills just do not cut surfaces in a "bow" shape unless programed to do so.
A lot of warping and bowing can occur in a spa shell or any other molded part during its cooling time however, the structural support of the tub under the shell should be rigid enough to take the bow out of the shell. Since you say that your pad is level (which also would have been my first guess) I have to agree with Markee, that the structural support under the tub is the cause of your problems
-
I know we can't diagnose this without seeing it, but if it does turn out to be structural support - or lack thereof - allowing the corners to droop, then it might be possible to shore them up and perhaps even jack them back up.
I sure wouldn't want to be the one to do that jacking, but if the dealer does it under the guidance of the factory, they are on the hook to be sure it could work.
This will be interesting to follow - please keep us updated if you would be so kind.
8-)
-
This is an interesting situation where cool minds prevail. Set your argument aside for a moment and let’s see how it develops. I think Chas is right and Doc raises some very good points, as you do yourself. You expected your Tub to meet “merchantability” standards.
Let’s get our cards face up on the table and see what road they take. The product should meet some level of standards (pardon the pun). Hot Tub and Cover were purchased together to do a job, and they were expected to perform as all hot tubs that are made level. After all the purpose of the cover is to insulate and seal heat in. Clearly, your pictures represent evidence of heat loss. Take some pics of the ice build up.
It would be nice if the warranty simply kicks in and gets everything done.
“….a little pressure of threats and bad publicity can go a long way…” I am sure your right, but, is that the right way to achieve the desired result? Hopefully, this doesn’t go there. Let’s see.
“....I expect an uphill battle…” that may be, but let’s not expect to start there. This all hinges on what is to be determined by Coast and the direction they take.
As Doc says, let’s see how this plays out.
-
Is foundation underneath the tub flat? My contracts state that you will provide a continuously level surface. If there is a dip in the concrete the frame of the spa would settle low and the shell would probably follow that dip. You might want to take a look at the foundation.
I drained and lifted the tub today (with straps and an electric winch mounted on an A-frame). The concrete pad is as close to perfect as I think you could get; 1 ~1.5mm (1/16") variation across the entire surface and no cracks.
I lowered it back down and refilled it with water; the corners are still lower (the same amount as before). The bottom of the skirting is flat and level on all 4 sides of the tub.
I'm going out on a limb here; the shell is fubar.
-
This is an interesting situation where cool minds prevail. Set your argument aside for a moment and let’s see how it develops. I think Chas is right and Doc raises some very good points, as you do yourself. You expected your Tub to meet “merchantability” standards.
Let’s get our cards face up on the table and see what road they take. The product should meet some level of standards (pardon the pun). Hot Tub and Cover were purchased together to do a job, and they were expected to perform as all hot tubs that are made level. After all the purpose of the cover is to insulate and seal heat in. Clearly, your pictures represent evidence of heat loss. Take some pics of the ice build up.
It would be nice if the warranty simply kicks in and gets everything done.
“….a little pressure of threats and bad publicity can go a long way…” I am sure your right, but, is that the right way to achieve the desired result? Hopefully, this doesn’t go there. Let’s see.
“....I expect an uphill battle…” that may be, but let’s not expect to start there. This all hinges on what is to be determined by Coast and the direction they take.
As Doc says, let’s see how this plays out.
Somewhere we have started to go a little astray; mostly my fault. When I started this topic, my opening line was " It's time to see how Coast Spas handles their warranties."
I did not mean that I am starting a war; I am definitely going to give Coast warranty the benefit of the doubt. I am just arranging my ammunition in case I need it.
I knew the district manager would try to feed me a little bit of fluff. I politely let him know that with my background and experience I know more than the average joe.
Knowing a bit about contract and consumer laws will give me an edge if they do not do the right thing; I might be able to slow or stop them in their tracks before it turns into a big out-of-control mess. I should have said that the threats and pressure will only be used if they do not do the right thing. Also, I want to be prepared with the answers for any excuse they may use.
Again, I'm hoping that this is going to be resolved peacefully as it should be. I hope that this topic does not go down in flames as it's a chance to see how Coast handles this matter.
I will keep everyone updated on the progress.
-
you should have to resort to threats, any blood pressure elevating tactics. Your dealer, through the manufacturer, should do the right thing. It is a defect in workmanship, clearly. Did you pay by credit card? Your card company can be helpful if you are not satisfied.