General > Beating a dead horse

Those with home show questions...Heres your sign!!

<< < (14/27) > >>

stl-rex:

--- Quote ---Stuart...you are allowed to trash talk any brand you want. If Rex gets hurt tough s**t I also could care less what brand anyone owns for that matter and if they feel they need to constantly justify there purchase and we are not allowed to say one is a piece of junk  and another is terribly built something is wrong. I just think it's funny how I get blasted for trash talking Arctic even though I never do and yet there are a few Arctic guys who instead of coming around and saying "they think Arctic is fine" they continualy jump in and say they are tired of us trash talking Arctic.

Well guess what. I could give a rip what you think. I can trash talk any brand I want!!!

Man this gets sickening, bunch of baby.
--- End quote ---


It doesn't hurt my feelings and what goes around comes around.  I generally post positive comments about Arctic regarding the seats and jets in the spa I own.  But I also see nothing wrong with responding to BS anti-Arctic rhetoric that invariably gets tossed into any Arctic discussion, solicited or otherwise.  At least you've sat in a Tundra and can legitimately express an opinion from it.  I'd venture to guess most have not.  And while some here claim it's the marketing and not the spa, the threads don't read that way.

Gomboman:
Oh my god, that was funny. I can't stop laughing thinking about the old people. That made my head ache go away.........



--- Quote ---Whatever you do, DO NOT EXHIBIT SPAS AT THE SENIOR EXPO!!!

I made that mistake last year and will never repeat it.  Busload after fussload of angry, bitter, scared folks who love to dump all over the hot tub parade.

"Who would take care of it for me?"
"I'd probably drown in one of those infernal contraptions!"
"How on earth would I get in and out?"
"I would never let anyone see me in a bathing suit!"
"Bathing in public is a sin."

I finally got so fed up, I told this one old geezer why didn't he just go on over to the Lakeview Memorial Cemetary booth and get on their waiting list.  He called me a rude sumbitch and walked off.  I did see him over in that direction later in the day.

Terminator
--- End quote ---

Cola:
Can somebody please start a new board for stl-rex so that he can keep writing to himself in peace.  You probably have the most efficient tub around buddy and I'm happy for you.  You will probably save about $80.00 per year in heating cost over my Epic and I'm happy for you.  Hopefully your equipment will withstand the heat from your non Canadian cooler climate so that you will be happy and that I can be happy for you too.  Last but not least, I wist that seat fit you a bit better so that you could spend even more time out there.
Steve :)

galen:
I can see that stl-rex is very biased in his opinions.  I looked and tested a lot of tubs before my wife  and I bought. She is only 5'3" tall. And we wanted a tub that wouldn't "float her" out of her seat. Say what you must, but its very clear you didn't test the maxxus.  All the seats but one have wrist jets, All the seats have foot jets, which she can brace with to keep her down into the seat if she has it on high. But its very simple to regulate the flow knob to reduce the flow to your liking. Yes there are other tubs that are very nice. But to say the Maxxus doesn't fit, shows you didn't do your homework well enough. I believe its more about cost than features that turns off a potential buyer. I can't see how seats could be made better  to fit. Hammer if you must, but it just shows me stl-rex, you would complain about the new rope these dealers are going to put around you.

windsurfdog:

--- Quote ---There are other reasons, but the FACT is full foam costs more, meaning so-called thermal pane costs less to manufacture.
--- End quote ---

If you could explain the difference between "thermal pane" and "so called thermal pane" maybe I can follow your line of thought.  I'm having to assume that the "so called thermal pane" to which you refer is nothing more than a poor implementation of thermal pane which has no more to do with ff v. tp than "so called ff" v. "so called tp".  Or maybe you think there is no such thing as a poor implementation of ff and no such thing as a good implementaion of tp.  Face it, your myopic view of this debate prevents you from seeing any benefit to tp so why not just come out and say it sucks and there is absolutely no benefit at all to tp--that it is inherently inferior and anyone who believes otherwise may be up for a Darwin award soon?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page